The Dynasty That Changed the World (next part)

In this part, we address the period from 1945 to 1963. As we have explained on other occasions, we seek to understand how a family dynasty, a small group of linked families, control almost all global events. Without their knowledge, it is impossible to understand what is happening globally. This oppressive system, which distances us from our nature as free beings in peace, was born centuries ago and today reaches its maximum development in the project of global governance.

We had concluded the seventh part in 1945, after the end of World War II, an event of fundamental importance in human history. This moment marked the establishment of a new world order, represented by the creation of the United Nations, a central project in global events and in the consolidation of a world government. This concept was not new; it was part of an ancient plan of the Rothschild family, which had begun and failed at the end of World War I with the League of Nations. In fact, its antecedents go back even to the Congress of Vienna in 1812. Ultimately, it is a series of attempts to establish a supranational government, such as the one the UN represents today, which exercises significant control over our lives.

For example, when a global pandemic is announced, the United Nations immediately issues an order that must be followed by the health ministries of all countries, including ours. Due to the agreements signed, these ministries are obliged to comply with those instructions; otherwise, they face sanctions, such as the suspension of loans, the reduction of technical assistance, the withdrawal of military aid, and other measures. In short, compliance becomes an unavoidable obligation. This is just one of the many examples I could offer about the actions of the Nations, or the educational system, or the military system, and other similar areas. Let us move on, as a series of events of great importance await us.

In 1947, the British, who before World War II had declared that they would not allow further Jewish immigration to Palestine, were participating in a central process within global governance and the establishment of a global government. Within that context, the creation of the State of Israel and, especially, the control of Jerusalem, constitute a fundamental part of the project of global domination. Why is this important? Because their goal is to establish a world government, and Jerusalem, by definition, is a city that, according to Jewish tradition, was chosen by Yahweh, the God of the Jews, as a sacred place for his people. The struggle to control that territory is not accidental; it reflects a global conflict for a place of great spiritual and symbolic significance, in a conflict that has deep implications in the vision of a world order.

Therefore, the English had the responsibility of protecting both the Palestinians and their own British soldiers residing in the area, against an Israeli armed group. Eventually, they decided to transfer control of Palestine to the United Nations. In other words, what did England do? It shed itself of the problem and handed it over to the United Nations. Resolution 181 of 1947 was a crucial moment.

That United Nations resolution divided Palestine into two states. In the next slide, we will see an image that better illustrates this division, expanding it for greater understanding.

It is fundamental to understand that the process of controlling that entire Palestinian region is crucial for understanding world events. In a short time, you will witness events that will leave you astonished in that area. Remember that there was an agreement between the Rothschild family and the government of England, through which they sought to involve the United States in World War II in exchange for ceding a part of the territories in Palestine.

This land, approximately 1300 years ago, belonged mainly to the Palestinians. At that time, mainly Palestinians lived there, with a small minority of Jews, who represented barely 6%. However, the Jewish presence at that moment was considered totally illegitimate, since they had no legitimate rights over the land, but were there simply to fulfill an agreement and a promise. Let us recall the Balfour Declaration, which we mentioned in previous chapters: a commitment by the British government to support the creation of a Jewish national home in Palestine, in response to a promise made to the United States, which had entered the war. According to that agreement, Palestine would be divided into two states: one Zionist and one Arab, with Jerusalem under international administration to guarantee access and respect for all religious faiths. This transfer of the land and the implementation of Resolution 181 were scheduled for May 15, 1948.

In reality, the United Nations had no legitimate right, no law or anything that supported them, to hand over the properties to the Jews. They only owned 6% of Palestine at that time. However, the resolution decided that Israel was going to be given 57% of the land, leaving the Arabs, who until then owned 94%, with only 43%.

In this image, you can see the evolution of the situation in the region over the last decades. All the maps represent the same area. The first map, from 1946, shows all the territory of Palestine in green, inhabited mostly by Palestinians, with 6% occupied by Jews. In 1947, in the second column, that area is distributed, and the United Nations assigns 47% of the territory to the Jews, which shows a significant reduction of Palestinian territory.

Then, a constant process of occupation of Palestinian lands is observed. The map covering the period from 1949 to 1967, marked by the Six-Day War, reflects how the Jewish advance, represented in white, continues to reduce Palestinian territory. By the year 2000, the map shows how the land has been even more displaced, and in the current situation, the situation is even worse: practically all the land has been appropriated by the State of Israel, leaving the Palestinians in an extremely reduced area.

This process not only reflects an imperialist occupation strategy but also largely explains the rebellion of the Palestinians and many of the recent events in international politics.

Perhaps, if you are reading this chapter for the first time, you may not clearly understand how this affects your life. However, that conflict and that decision by the Zionists to influence the United Nations, an organization they helped to found, are of fundamental importance. Let us remember the Treaty of Versailles, where, through the Rothschilds and other actors, the creation of the League of Nations was decided. Today, that conflict continues to be the center of global attention and, from there, the Third World War is expected to emerge, as well as a series of events that will mark a profound change in the history of humanity.

During the spring of 1948, the Rothschilds bribed President Harry S. Truman, who was then the 33rd President of the United States, to get him to recognize Israel as a sovereign state. According to the accounts, they gave him two million dollars on his campaign train, thus securing the official declaration. In less than half an hour, Truman proclaimed that the United States would be the first nation to recognize Israel, and in that same act the flag of the new state was unveiled.

On April 19, 132 Jewish terrorists from Irgun and Stern, led by the future Prime Minister of Israel, Menachem Begin, and the Stern Gang, led by the future Israeli Prime Minister, Yitzhak Shamir, massacred 200 people in Deir Yassin.

After the creation of the Jewish State on May 15, Israel launched an attack with loudspeakers warning the Arabs that they must flee or be sacrificed. As a consequence, 800,000 Arabs fled, many without their documents, and asked for help from Arab countries, which did not intervene. The Jews now controlled 78% of Palestine, instead of the 57% assigned by the UN. The Palestinians, mostly Christians, did not receive compensation for their properties and ended up in refugee camps, losing even their birth certificates. Israel then passed a law that only allowed those who could prove citizenship to return, leaving out some 400,000 Palestinians who lost their property.

The flag in question showed a blue version of the Rothschilds’ “Red Hexagram Shield,” a symbol that generated great controversy and rejection among many Jews. These people saw in it a connection to ancient mystery religions and symbols associated with Elohim such as Moloch, Baal, and Astaroth, falsely considered “demons” today in various occult traditions.

Many associate this symbol with something negative and demonic, but this has a logical explanation that starts in the Middle Ages. I do not know if there is a direct historical relationship between the hexagram (six-pointed star) and any Elohim; there are no records. Could there have been? We do not know. The hexagram has diverse origins in sacred geometry; it is a very ancient symbol represented on objects and places of worship of all religions. It is a symbol known to the Sumerians long before the appearance of the Hebrews, just as it was also known in ancient Egypt, India, China, and South America. In Judaism, it was consolidated as the Star of David (Magen David), a symbol of identity and protection.

The choice of an ancestral symbol such as the hexagram, which has been used in esoteric and religious contexts throughout history, was interpreted by some as a symbol linked to mystery rituals and the occult elite that would be behind certain international movements. The use of this symbol on the flag of Israel, therefore, generated intense debate about the hidden and symbolic implications in the formation of the State and in national identity.

And this power game is absolutely transcendent because many of the difficulties you have in life and that you have in your country are related to this process of world governance, with those immense, phenomenal transfers of money from your country to international financial banking.

We could talk about what Einstein thought along with a group of the 25 most prestigious Jewish scientists in the world when they wrote an extensive letter to the New York Times about all these issues related to the founding of the State of Israel and so on. But the focus of this series has to do with the use of the financial, economic, industrial, political, and also military power of the Rothschild dynasty.

On October 1, 1949, Mao Tse Tung proclaimed the founding of the People’s Republic of China in Tiananmen Square, Beijing. As I have explained to you on several occasions, the existence of a revolutionary movement, of a country or sector that decides to undertake a war, can only be understood from the perspective of financing. That is, there is always someone who provides the necessary resources: weapons, food, clothing, and transport. There is no other way to sustain a conflict of that magnitude.

For example, in the case of a country, it cannot immediately allocate funds from its annual budget to the war, since those resources are allocated to other activities. The solution is to incur debt, and in that process international banking intervenes, financing both sides of a conflict. History has clearly shown this: during World War II, for example, banking financed both the Nazis and the Allies.

The same happened with Mao and the Chinese Revolution. The only way to understand that history is through the analysis of financing, which came, to a large extent, from international banking, including the Rothschilds, who have played a fundamental role in the creation and financing of movements and political systems, including communism. The real history, the one that can be found in independent sources, reveals that these events were possible thanks to the intervention of these financial agents, rather than being simply the result of internal or spontaneous processes.

This declaration by Mao was financed by the Rothschilds, who had created communism in Russia, and also by the following Rothschild agents: Solomon Adler, a former US Treasury official who was a Soviet spy, Israel Epstein, son of a Jewish Bolshevik imprisoned by the Tsar of Russia for attempting to foment a revolution there, and Frank Coe, a senior official of the IMF owned by the Rothschilds.

On April 1, 1951, the Israeli Secret Intelligence Agency, the Mossad, was founded, which would go on to terrorize the world. The Mossad’s motto is quite harsh: “By way of deception thou shalt make war” (in Hebrew: *be-tachbūlōt ta‘aseh leḥēm*). The phrase comes from Proverbs 24:6, which in Hebrew can be translated as “For by wise counsel thou shalt make thy war: and in the multitude of counsellors there is safety.” But in some versions and in the institutional use of the Mossad it has been interpreted as “By way of deception thou shalt make war.” This translation emphasizes the dimension of cunning and covert operations, more than the idea of counsel. In media and intelligence analysis, the more direct version is frequently cited: “By way of deception thou shalt make war.”

In 1953, as part of their industrial and financial expansion, the Rothschilds founded the Newfoundland Corporation Limited to develop 60,000 square miles of land in Newfoundland, Canada. This included a hydroelectric power plant to harness the power of Hamilton Falls (later renamed Churchill Falls). Projects like this reflect how the economic and financial elites of the time began to consolidate their control over strategic resources and territories, a process that would be pivotal in the history of global dominance.

The control over society—often described as manipulation by the elites—is not an isolated event, but a key factor in human history and development. At the center of this system is money, financial control, which actually functions as debt and has become a global tool of domination. Today, the dollar governs world trade: your country needs it to import, but cannot create it, since its issuance is in the hands of actors such as the Federal Reserve and large international banks. Therefore, it must obtain dollars by exporting, attracting investments, or, in many cases, incurring debt.

But furthermore, this pincer operation was extending and, for example, we have seen how all the media today are controlled by Zionist organizations and you will only receive absolutely manipulated, tendentious information that generates an official history that is certainly very different from the real history, from what is really happening.

Also within that pincer operation to dominate the world, we have the use of educational systems. The deterioration of educational systems throughout the world is not a coincidence, the educational crisis that exists throughout the world and the uniformity of educational systems throughout the world are not a coincidence, which of course come perfectly diagrammed from the United Nations via UNESCO to your country, mine, and everyone’s.

Also in that pincer operation, political power is used, and we have seen how innumerable political organizations have been created with the aim of infiltrating the different political parties. Both sides are financed, left, right, they are exported from above, from below, in all countries of the world by the same financial groups to then obtain the dominion and control of those situations.

Also in the health area we see how the pincer operation also affects this area a lot, where mass vaccination is forced, where very severe rules are being established to control the functioning of the systems. This area has been primordial for being able to exercise this domination, implementing nanotechnology treacherously throughout the world that they will later use for their benefit and our detriment. If you are new to this topic, I recommend you read the “History of a Genocide” series patiently, where we were the first in the world to demonstrate what the covid vaccines actually contained: graphene oxide.

Also in the food systems, the Codex Alimentarius is currently in force, which is already governing in your country, mine, throughout the world, and you will be surprised by the things you will see in the coming years in relation to the control of the production and distribution of food, as well as the production and distribution of dietary supplements, population policies, etc. In this project and process, a key strategy is to generate wealth by controlling all essential sectors: industrial, commercial, and service.

In 1957, James de Rothschild died and it was reported (by Rothschild-owned media) that he left a large sum of money in inheritance to the State of Israel to pay for the construction of the parliament building, the Knesset. He claimed that the Knesset should be a symbol in the eyes of all men of the permanence of the State of Israel. And in that same year Maurice de Rothschild also died, and each of these deaths is very important because he is succeeded by the youngest son within the dynasty, within the way in which the rights to continue managing the businesses and the different activities of the group were inherited.

In 1962, within that process of economic growth, Rothschild Frères created Imétal as an umbrella company for all its interests in mineral extraction. Frederic Morton published his book, The Rothschilds, in which he points out the following:

“Although they control dozens of industrial, commercial, mining and tourist companies, not one bears the name Rothschild. Being private, the family houses do not need, nor will they ever need, to publish any public balance sheet, or any other report of their financial situation.”

This attitude reveals the true objective of the Rothschilds: to remain hidden behind the scenes, exercising, monopolizing, dominating, eliminating competition and creating their own commercial, industrial, and service monopoly in the world, as is indeed happening today.

We thus reach the end of this period. On June 4, 1963, John F. Kennedy, the 35th President of the United States, signed Executive Order 11110, which reinstated the power of the federal government to issue currency without relying on the Federal Reserve—a private entity historically linked to major bankers like the Rothschilds.

Before, other presidents who challenged private control over money, such as Andrew Jackson and Abraham Lincoln, had faced threats and even assassinations. Many consider that this monetary measure, along with his open opposition to secret societies and his rejection of the influence of financial elites, was one of the fundamental reasons behind Kennedy’s assassination.

In a very well-known speech, President John F. Kennedy openly criticized secret societies and affirmed that, during his mandate, he would not allow them to exercise influence or pressure on his government. Less than six months later, on November 22, 1963, he was assassinated. Some link it to the fact that, just like Abraham Lincoln in 1865—who was assassinated after issuing fiat currency without resorting to the banks—Kennedy also sought to reform the monetary system. Specifically, he had ordered the issuance of Treasury certificates (known as “Kennedy banknotes”) as an alternative to the dollar issued by the Federal Reserve system, a private entity that, in practice, controls the creation of money in the United States. In most countries, it is the State—not private entities—that issues the national currency. That is why many consider it anomalous that in the US a private bank has that power. Other presidents, such as Andrew Jackson, also faced strong conflicts—and even attacks—for opposing the power of the big banks.

What Lyndon B. Johnson, who assumed the presidency after Kennedy’s assassination, did is extremely significant. At the time of the crime, Johnson was in Dallas, and while returning to Washington aboard Air Force One, he issued one of his first decisions: to repeal Executive Order 11110, signed by Kennedy just months before.

That order returned the power to the US government to issue currency without relying on the Federal Reserve. Annulment just hours after the assassination—thus eliminating a measure that challenged private control over the issuance of the dollar—cannot fail to draw attention. Many see in this fact a clear sign that the financial interests involved were not willing to surrender their hegemony over the monetary system.

Nor can the following hypothesis about Kennedy’s assassination in relation to his stance against Israel be proven with certainty. Kennedy made it clear to Prime Minister Ben Gurion that he would not allow Israel to become a nuclear state, aware of the imbalance that implied in the Middle East. According to the newspaper “Haaretz” (1999), Kennedy’s assassination interrupted US pressure on Israel to suspend its nuclear program, similar to the current pressure on Iran.

If we make a summary of this period, we can appreciate a series of events that are perfectly connected, clearly coordinated and united in the same strategy to establish a world government. In the first place, the importance of the United Nations stands out, which is the key piece in the establishment of global government. When the final declaration of peace and security in Jerusalem is made and distributed, the United Nations armies will be present there, controlling the situation in the name of “guarantee.”

During this time, we have also observed a growing dominance of the Rothschilds in the Palestine region, which is a central part of their process of hegemony and control. The final objective remains the establishment of world government. Furthermore, continuous growth has been evident in the commercial, financial, and industrial areas. On the political level, we have seen a control process that has even led to the assassination of a President of the United States, an event that can be interpreted or suggested as a possible explanation for the assassination of such a prominent figure as that leader.

In the ninth part, we will address the most recent years, reaching up to 2006. Thus, those who have followed this series will have a complete vision to understand what is happening in the world and prepare for the changes that are already underway.